Georgia Terry MBA Recommendation Questions
The University of Georgia Terry College of Business full-time MBA program application for the fall 2026 intake is now open, so you and your referees can find the Georgia Terry MBA recommendation questions here.
Georgia Terry requires two recommendations. The Admissions Committee prefers that one recommendation be from a direct supervisor, but this is not a requirement. It is advised to choose individuals who can speak directly and specifically to your professional performance and future potential, someone who knows you from a leadership role. Georgia Terry accepts the Common Letter of Recommendation (LOR).
2025-2026 Georgia Terry MBA Recommendation Questions
Section 1: Recommender Information
Context of Relationship:
- Current Employer
- Previous Employer
- University/Academic
- Extra Curricular/Community
- Other
Relationship to applicant:
- Direct Supervisor
- Other Supervisor
- Advisor/Mentor
- Colleague/Peer
- Direct Report
- Indirect Report
- Client/Customer
- Business Partner/Investor
- Vendor
- Professor/Instructor
- Other
How long have you known the applicant?
During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
If you are affiliated with the Terry College of Business or University of Georgia, please select the option that most closely matches:
- Faculty
- UCLA Anderson Graduate
- UCLA Graduate
- Staff
- Not affiliated
- Other
Section 2: Competency Ratings
In this section, you will find 16 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:
- Achievement
- Influence
- People
- Personal Qualities
- Cognitive Abilities
For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.
Achievement
1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems
2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement
Influence
3. Communication: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that they can be easily heard and accepted and can engage an audience; uses listening and other attending behaviors to create a shared understanding of topic
- No basis for judgment
- Gets point across; responds to explicit concerns when asked
- Stays on topic; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; organizes content so that it is easily understood; takes time to listen
- Present views clearly and structures content to present views in a way that is logical and easily followed by a broad audience; acknowledges audience feedback
- Explicitly structures content to engage specific audience segments; uses tailored language and examples that appeal to specific groups; asks pertinent questions; restates or paraphrases what others have said to check for understanding
- Structures content for senior-level meetings and presentations and maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns and incorporates them “in the moment;” discusses them openly and adjusts communication
4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control
5. Professional Impression, Poise and Presence: Maintains self-control and positive external response even in time of crisis or conflict; manages impression made on others
- No basis for judgment
- Speaks politely, demonstrates generally accepted manners; expresses desire to make a positive impression
- Remains measured in a variety of situations; works to manage impression and prepares for situations to appear confident
- When emotions are aroused, actively restrains from expressing them; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently to situation or circumstance
- Channels strong emotion into positive action; comes across as confident and strong, responds rapidly and strongly to crisis
- When in strong conflict, restrains emotional response (grace under pressure); takes positive action to respond and engage with all stakeholders; has strong presence (‘gravitas’) and charisma; mobilizes followership to take action in times of crisis
People
6. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions
7. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams
8. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time
9. Change Leadership: Energizes and aligns groups of people to participate in organizational change
- Encourages people to go along with change
- Challenges status quo and identifies what needs to change
- Defines positive direction for change and persuades others to support it by providing compelling reasons and vision
- Mobilizes individuals to change behavior by using a range of tailored appeals to motives
- Builds coalition of supporters and coordinates change across multiple individuals; creates champions who will mobilize others to change
11. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure
12. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses
Cognitive
13. Information Seeking: Probes deeply into issues and seeks out facts and evidence needed to inform decisions
- No basis for judgment
- Asks direct questions about current problem with immediately available individuals
- Investigates problems by going directly to sources of information
- Asks a series of probing questions to get to the root of a situation or a problem
- Does research by making a systematic effort over a limited period of time to obtain needed data or feedback
- Involves others who would not normally be involved including experts or outside organizations; gets them to seek out information
14. Analytical Thinking: Reasons from causes to effects, through multiple steps as needed
- No basis for judgment
- Sorts information by using lists or categories
- Sees obvious implications; maps single causes to single effects
- Organizes and classifies complex or large sets of data; sees multiple and/or subtle implications, maps multiple causes to single effect, and single cause to multiple effects
- Follows complex lines of reasoning with multiple causes and effects; extracts relevant data to test assumptions and identifies likely causes/implications
- Undertakes complex tasks and applies accurate logic to break them down into manageable parts in a systematic way; maps complex causes and effects systems and draws logical and objective conclusions from data, information and analyses conducted
15. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution
16. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work
(Optional) Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you’d like to comment?
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group?
- Below Average
- Average
- Very Good (well above average)
- Excellent (top 10%)
- Outstanding (top 5%)
- The best encountered in my career
Overall, I…this applicant to The Fuqua School of Business.
- Do Not Recommend this applicant
- Recommend this applicant with Reservations
- Recommend this applicant
- Enthusiastically recommend this applicant
Section 3: Written Answers
Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Recommended word count: 50 words)
How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words)
Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 500 words)
(Optional) Is there anything else we should know?
