Got into HBS, Wharton (some money), and Columbia (full ride). I live in NYC and don’t really want to move. My concern though is that almost all the Columbia admits seem to be people who arnt good enough to get Into the better programs and are going there because of that. Many of them are trying to do investment banking and mbb while those at the other schools have already been there done that. Would I be leaving a lot on the table taking the money and nyc? I assume employers look at Columbia grads as plan b if they can’t get the grads from HBS. Could I go to Columbia and put I got into HBS on my resume so employers know that I’m not a typical Columbia student or does it not matter? I’ve rulled Wharton out, not worth moving for them since HBS is obviously a tier above.
I also already make fantastic money so I don’t need to do an MBA but would love a break from the grind but want to make sure I’m not taking a step back. Thanks!
Already have an account? Click here to login.
With that said, I find it puzzling that you talk about "wanting a break from the grind" and making "fantastic money", yet you are leaning towards staying in NYC and taking the offer from the program that has offered you the biggest scholarship. This doesn't feel consistent. [Also, as a side note: earning an MBA at any of these schools is actually a pretty intense process - such that you might feel even busier than you are currently at work - albeit in a very different context.]
Also, to your question, I would not recommend that including the fact that you were "accepted at HBS, but chose Columbia" on your resume. I have never seen anyone do such a thing, and if they did it would be a red flag for me (potentially suggesting a lack of self-confidence on the part of the job candidate and an over-emphasis on surface vs. substance).
(4)
Already have an account? Click here to login.